Abused By Illusions

Interesting, now the courts have turned to calling documents of record of the JustUs system "theories?" I used to think that were were quickly sliding down the slippery slope. Now I know we are in the pit!

C.I. Abramson

Read the story at Breaking News

These guys have put together a petition against a draft before there is a draft. In their words the best time to stop a draft is before there is one and we concur. They have assembled a great clearinghouse of news stories, commentaries, policy papers, government documents, publications, and pending legislation dealing with the draft. If you get the chance stop by and sign the petition against the draft and have a look around...Mothers Against the Draft

C.I. Abramson

Two Faux News reporters were fired from their jobs after doing a story about how Bovine Growth Hormone (BGH) was being introduced into the milk supply. They were first offered larged amounts of money to kill the story due to pressure from the mega agricompany Monsanto. Monsanto has fought vememntly to keep from having to honestly label dairy products containing BGH. BGH is thought to cause cancer and has subsequently been banned throughout Europe and is not approved in Canada. The two reporters were first rewarded damages after their firing from Faux but this was overturned after a ruling that the press had: NO REQUIREMENT TO TELL THE TRUTH.

I guess we now know why the media was the biggest mouth piece for the big lie of WMDs in Iraq. The press has decided to go from the traditional profession of the fourth estate back to that of the oldest profession. To read fruther on this check this link out.

C.I. Abramson

This story is big folks! So why haven't we heard anything about it in the mainstream media?

C.I. Abramson
Ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

February 06, 2005

By Willowdean Vance (View author info)
Copyright Willowdean Vance


Queensbury, New York -
"...absent an effort to seek enforcement through a federal court, IRS summonses apply no force to taxpayers, and no consequence whatever can befall a taxpayer who refuses, ignores, or otherwise does not comply with an IRS summons until that summons is backed by a federal court order…[a taxpayer] cannot be held in contempt, arrested, detained, or otherwise punished for refusing to comply with the original IRS summons, no matter the taxpayer's reasons, or lack of reasons for so refusing." U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Schulz v. IRS, Case No. 04-0196-cv - January 25, 2005

Read the full story at the American Homeowners Resource Center.